From the article http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3795142a10,00.html
Church in uproar over gay hate slur
13 September 2006 By ANNA CHALMERS
A
slur campaign warning that "gays are a cancer" in the Presbyterian
Church has sickened members as they prepare to vote on a ruling banning
homosexual ministers.
Bumper
stickers have been sent to the Presbyterian Assembly's 500 members
nationwide, inflaming an issue that already threatens to split the
Church.
The assembly sets the Church's policy and direction.
Members
vote later this month on a ruling to exclude homosexuals and anyone
in a sexual relationship outside marriage from becoming ministers or
Church elders.
The
bumper stickers, which were sent out anonymously, say "Gays aren't
welcome in our church, help us let New Zealand know" and "Gays are a
cancer in our church, let's keep them out of leadership".
The Human Rights Commission says the bumper stickers constitute hate speech but under current laws little can be done.
I highlighted the word anonymously because whoever sent these
stickers out obviously doesn't have the courage to be accountable for
their inflammatory rhetoric. Within this context we don't know who
made up these stickers. For all we know it could be along the same
lines as clever gay identified activists who made up "heterosexuals only" stickers and applied them to public amenities in Boise Idaho.
Chances are though that these were sent out by someone very
frustrated with the increased focus on condoning unbiblical sexuality
in the Presbyterian Church. The Church, as a whole, is supposed to be
founded by Christ and His revelation to us through His Life and
scriptures. The frustration is very apparent in the soundbyte messages
on these stickers. The problem is that while the scriptures do call us
to have an answer, comparing those with same sex attraction to a
horrible painful disease is not a good or accurate way to go. In other
words, these stickers do not provide an answer and instead inflame
division.
Truth is, if the church is hijacked by social culture war issues and
not primarily focussed on the preservation and propogation of the
gospel, it will split. A church has every right to adopt and enforce a
moral code for it's leadership. The scriptures are very clear that church leadership is held to a high standard of accountability
and must be in line with the scriptural mandates set for leadership.
People actively engaged in sexual sin (heterosexual or homosexual) do
not meet those mandates (included in the link and many other places in
scripture.) The answer is not in stigmatizing people who are in sexual
sin but in providing avenues that welcome them into the church, provide
resources to help those who are repentant and avenues for service to
those who are continually being sanctified and called into ministry.
I would not expect the MCC (gay centered church network) to allow
me, a formerly gay identified man who has overcome same sex attraction
and called to help others of similar beliefs to do the same, into its
membership or leadership. It would be ridiculous of me to expect and
want to serve an organization that I can't agree with over what
biblical relationships should look like and scriptural authority to
define the Creator's intent and call for repentance. Conservative
churchs should have the same freedom to uphold biblical morality as an
expectation for their leadership and not hijacked by a pro-gay
identified agenda. All the while, this should be done with respect and
not stigmatization.
Sidenote: I am not sure what the "hate speech" laws in New
Zealand are but it is a travesty that they even exist. While I believe
stigmatizing the same sex attracted is wrong, it's just as wrong to
punish free speech.