My Photo

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz


Pro-Gay Censorship Law Crops Up in Colorado

From WorldNetDaily:

A new Colorado law is helping homosexual activists achieve their goal of forcing Christians to teach biblical condemnation of homosexuality only behind the closed doors of their sanctuaries.

The as-yet untested state law promotes sexual identity "perception" to the level of skin color under state discrimination laws.

Some opponents are calling it a "bona fide censorship law," and top analysts for Focus on the Family, the Christian publishing and broadcast powerhouse, are expressing concern over the "mischief" they expect to follow the signing by As WND reported, Ritter, a Democrat, struck gender-specific restrooms and locker rooms statewide when he signed the plan into law in May.

The law makes it illegal to deny a person access to public accommodations, including restrooms and locker rooms, based on gender identity or the "perception" of gender identity.

"Who would have believed that the Colorado state legislature and its governor would have made it fully legal for men to enter and use women's restrooms and locker-room facilities without notice or explanation?" said James Dobson, founder of Focus.

Read the whole article >>

Sex-Ed Dispute Aired in Court

From WashingtonPost.com:

A six-year battle over the content of a new sex education curriculum in Montgomery County schools came down to two questions posed yesterday in a Rockville courtroom: Can the school board legally teach students that homosexuality is innate? And can the lessons discuss sex acts other than copulation?

Montgomery educators are defending the new curriculum, approved by the school board last summer, which addresses sexual orientation as a classroom topic for the first time. The lessons place the county at the fore of a trend among some of the nation's public schools toward more candor in discussing homosexuality. But they have prompted a strenuous challenge from religious conservatives who see the curriculum as a one-sided endorsement of homosexuality.

Read the whole article >>

Liberty Sunday Press Conference

Who: Tony Perkins (Family Research Council), Alan Chambers (Exodus), Pastor Pendleton (Tremont Temple Baptist Church), David Parker, Robert Wirthlin, Kris Mineau (Massachusetts Family Institute), Bishop Harry Jackson (Hope Christian Church).

What: Press conference concerning Liberty Sunday Simulcast

When: 3:00 pm EDT, October 15, 2006

Where: Tremont Temple Baptist Church

Disclaimer: The following is simply notes and paraphrasing I (Randy) wrote down during the press conference.  Direct quotes are properly noted within the text.  Everything else is paraphrased and spring from my understanding of what the presenters said.

First up Tony Perkins with the Family Research Council.  Tony shares that he was very excited about tonight's simulcast.  the reason they chose Boston is because same sex marriage started in this state and what we see in its wake is the loss of religious freedom.  As they have condoned same sex marriage, the state condemns Christian expression in the public square.  He said that this press conference and the simulcast won't be just about organizational spokespersons.  The message will be brought by the people who have been detrimentally affected by the decision of four judges in Massachusetts.  A decision that is setting a dangerous precedent and conflict around the country.

Dr. Ray Pendleton Pastor at Tremont Temple Baptist Church stated, "We think it is important to uphold what is best for the culture and the country.  We want to speak what is truth, in love."

Letthepeople Kris Mineau, heads up Massachusetts Family Institute said something to the effect of tonight's events will help emphasize the point for the Mass legislature should finally allow the people of Massachusetts to speak for themselves instead of unelected judges ignoring the will of the people and speaking for them.

David Parker was up next.  His son, when  in kindergarten was given a diversity book-bag that indoctrinates children with beliefs about homosexuality that are  contrary to the beliefs of the parents and the welfare of these five year olds.  The rights of parents are being trampled for the rights of a rampant gay agenda.

David Parker quotes Robert Scutch,  the author of pro-gay children's book, "Who's a Family?" put in the "diversity book-bag":  Scutch states, "I wrote the book for children before they know that there is any other way." 

David Parker continues, that the gay agenda is being promoted non-stop in many ways;  Day of Silence, Coming Out Day, High School students going to lower grades to talk about coming out and resources being made available to grade school and beyond.  Mr. Parker simply wants parents to be notified and given their right to opt out.  The Lexington school system will not notify parents.  Mr. Parker's conclusion is that where Religious liberty is compromised all liberties are compromised.  Parents need to take a stand for children around the country.  The ACLU is trampling on religious freedom and parents by helping the school system against the parents.

Rob Wirthlin is the father of a seven year old who, without Mr. Wirthlin's knowledge or consent, was read a book by his second grade teacher called King and King which is about romantic love between two princes who eventually marry. The Wirthlin's asked the teacher for a meeting but the night before that meeting, the principal called and intimated that the Wirthlin's had ulterior motives and she was gong to be there whether they wanted her to be there or not.  The Principal said that the Teacher said she chose the book specifically because she felt it was something that the little boys could relate too.    Mr. Wirthlin says, "I am standing for parents rights. Parents should be the ones who decide when where and how to approach these subjects with their very own children."

Tony Perkins announces Freedom Watch.  As long as liberty is in danger... FRC will keep watch and fight for liberty.

Alan Chambers was next.  Tony said that Alan was, "the most controversial speaker."  He said Exodus takes a message of hope across the country. There is a message of hope for the homosexual who wants to find freedom from homosexuality.   Tony said, "Those who are the trumpeters of tolerance have little tolerance for Alan's message."  Alan shared about how religious liberty is in danger as evidenced by the huge protest at last year's Love Won Out Conference at Tremont Temple Baptist church.  Close to two thousand people screamed, among other things, "Shut down Focus On The Family!" "Shut down Dr. Dobson!" "Shut down ex-gays!" "Shut down Tremont Temple!" no call for tolerance, just a desire to impose silence against those that disagree with the gay activists.  While it is important to fight for the preservation of religious liberties and important social issues, we must also have grace and compassion.  We must provide hope and help for those seeking freedom from homosexuality.

Tony Perkins says that the opponents say that religious conservatives use gay issues as wedge issues but Tony calls them a bridge issue.  There is no other issue (gay agenda) that has brought modern Christians together so well.  One of the side benefits of this unnecessary battle is an increasingly colorblind church.

Bishop Harry Jackson is the senior pastor of Hope Christian Church.  He gave a stirring history of black community struggling and leading the way to liberty. He states that the black pulpit in America has actually been the engine for the black community.  Black Pastors deserve to be heard and to have their voices count.  In the mid-term election you are going to see a growing union in the church and that is going to change the tide and turn back the gay agenda.  More than ever before you are going to see Values Voters show up and make a difference in America.

Afterward, the media questions were basic fact finding and not much else to report except one incident that deserves it's very own post.

Before closing this post however, I wanted to say that all the presenters were very calm, humble and eloquent.  My notes do not do them justice.  I also met Mr. Parker and Mr. Wirthlin after the press conference and I have to tell you, they are two very protective, humble and loving Dad's.  They were not activists before the Lexington School Board decided to usurp their parental rights but now that this school board has forced the fight... they will do whatever it takes to protect their children.  I genuinely enjoyed meeting these two men.

Also at the press conference, I met John Schroeder with Blogotional and Joe Carter with Evangelical Outpost.  These guys are serious bloggers and you really should check out their blogs on a regular basis. I truly enjoyed meeting them and discussing Christians, politics and blogging!  They were a lot of fun to meet.

Continue reading "Liberty Sunday Press Conference" »

No to Hate Crimes - Yes to Dignity & Respect

This month my testimony of surviving a physical assault, when I was gay identified, was printed in the Exodus Impact.  I have attached the testimony to this post so if interested, you can download (It is an Adobe file.  You can get the free reader here.)

In addition I wrote the following for the newsletter:

In this edition of the Impact you have read my testimony of facing true hatred and paying a heavy price for being openly gay identified.  I will never forget the night I was attacked.  I have forgiven my attackers and received healing for those memories.  Today, I remember that pain and allow it to empower a passion to stop true violence against gay-identified people.

Most Senators and Conservative Christian groups on Capital Hill have read this testimony.  When Alan and I have visit with Senators and staff, we state directly that while we oppose bad public policy on a national level, we know that pockets of true homophobia still exist.  Each time we visit an office, our team was very clear that we do not condone violence.  If there was any way possible we would take the attack personally rather than allowing our gay loved ones to suffer.

However, mandating on a federal level that some people deserve more justice than others is a terrible public policy move that undermines the heart and spirit of true civil rights.  A federal policy will not make the difference in every corner of the nation.  What will is bold leadership of Congressional men and women, and local leadership having community wide dialogs.  They can lead by creating a forum of respected pro-gay activists, pastors and former homosexuals to assess the state of homosexual concerns for their area.  This forum can more effectively address the concerns of each community’s own issues and ways to increase greater civility and respect for all persons in each community.  It is my prayer that true tolerance for everyone, including former homosexuals, will be fostered in these gatherings.

Leaders addressing their spheres of influence at the point of need will do much more good for their community than a national policy that threatens the civil liberties of one group in the name of protecting the same for another.

Let us show our gay identified neighbors and community that we love them: being honest that small pockets of hatred can and do exist; and initiating dialog and speak against evil directed toward the gay identified community.  We should not let our good hearts and good intentions lead us to pass bad public policy.

The Following was added as a highlighted statement in the newsletter:

Our team does not condone violence.  If there was any way possible, we would take the attack personally rather than allowing our gay loved ones to suffer.

Mandating on a federal level that some people deserve more justice than others is a terrible public policy move that undermines the heart and spirit of true civil rights.  What will make a difference are bold Senators, House Representatives and local leadership having community wide dialogs; creating a forum joining respected pro-gay activists, pastors and former homosexuals to assess the state of homosexual concerns for their area, each community assessing what they believe to be important issues and ways to increase greater civility and respect for all persons in each community.  It is our prayer that true tolerance for everyone, including former homosexuals, will be fostered in these gatherings.

Every person deserves civility and dignity.  All violence is hatred.  Let us initiate dialog and speak against evil directed toward the gay identified community.  At the same time, let us not let our good hearts and good intentions lead us to pass bad public policy.

Some of you who regularly read this blog go silent when I post stuff of this nature.  I want to encourage you to add your comments.  You don't have to engage those who don't particularly care for my point of view :).

Download HateCrimes.pdf   Need help reading it?  Get the free Adobe Reader here.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Should We Legislate Against Phelps' Hate?

Fred Phelps and his Westboro Baptist Church have made a crusade out of hating homosexuals. Phelps' mantra, "God hates fags," has been seen in big block letters on rainbow placards for many years. He's dedicated his faith, his church and his life to harassing and hating gay-identified people as well as anyone who doesn't join in his vitriol.

Although it's been going on for some time, the media is now picking up on Phelps' protests at the funerals of American soldiers killed in Iraq. From the Chicago Tribune:

The demonstrators say the deaths in Iraq are divine punishment for America's permissiveness on homosexuality. They carry signs with messages like "God Hates the USA" and "Thank God for Dead Soldiers." For a grieving family, they add gratuitous insult to a terrible loss.

What's heating up this controversy even more is some legislators' desire to stop Phelps with law.

Most Americans would probably agree with Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.), sponsor of a bill to limit demonstrations at federal cemeteries, who denounces these spectacles as "repugnant, outrageous, despicable."

A lot of people would also agree that stern action by the government is needed. Nine states have enacted measures addressed at these protests. A bill pushed by Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn passed the Illinois Senate and is scheduled for a House committee hearing Wednesday.

However, Phelps and his false gospel might prove a stumbling block to the real one. I hate to think that free speech might be applied to Westboro's message of hate, but it's certainly been used to allow the objectification of women (and men) in pornography, and many other heinous points of view our society finds more tolerable.

The danger I see is the potential precedent some gay activists may take. As we know, many of them have called the message of Exodus "repugnant, outrageous" and "despicable" before. In Canada and Europe it's already fallen under their definition of criminal 'hate speech.'

While legislation might be a quick and easy solution to stop these cruel demonstrations, the best answer to false and hateful speech is to speak love and truth even louder (check out the Patriot Guard Riders).

As for me, I'll say this: Phelps is a wolf in sheep's clothing and doesn't know Jesus. He needs to become acquainted with 1st Corinthians 6:9, 10 and 11, as well as 1 John 4:7, 8. I also think the true church needs to rise up and decry him a little louder.

FRC President concerned about Lieberman-Levin Amendment

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/3/32006h.asp

"...Tony Perkins is concerned about a piece of legislation that is in the early stages of working its way to the floor of the U.S. Senate. The Family Research Council president is convinced the "Lieberman-Levin Amendment," if enacted, would impose unconstitutional free-speech restrictions on grassroots groups like FRC. Perkins contends the measure would give Congress the authority to "scrutinize and regulate" the constitutionally protected efforts of groups to alert citizens to legislative developments in Congress. The amendment has been introduced in the wake of the scandal involving lobbyist Jack Abramoff. But Perkins says attempts to address concerns emerging from that scandal should not be used to encroach on Americans' basic constitutional liberties. "[T]he amendment approved by the [Homeland Security and Governmental Reform Committee] violates the constitutionally protected right of citizens to petition government, stifles debate, and shuts out the voice of average citizens," says the FRC president. He labels the amendment a "red herring" that effectively removes the focus from corruption within the lobbying community and tries to make non-profit citizen groups the "whipping boy." Perkins is urging that the amendment be stripped from the overall bill when it reaches the Senate floor. "- Jody Brown, Agape Press, 3 Mar 2006

Same-sex marriage ban to be debated in Legislature

http://www.woi-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=4300928&nav=1LFX

"The issue of whether a same-sex marriage ban should be included in the Iowa Consitution likely will be debated in the upcoming legislative session.Senate Republican leaders want to debate the proposal, which passed in the House last year, but was blocked in the evenly divided Senate. It would put the ban on gay marriage in the Iowa Consitution with voter approval.

Senate Republican Leader Stewart Iverson, of Clarion, says a gay rights group from New York wants to change Iowa's law to permit gay couples to marry."- WOI-TV, Des Moines, Jan 2, 2006

Texas becomes 19th state with marriage amendment

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22033

"Texas voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional marriage amendment Nov. 8, but Maine citizens voted to keep a new "gay rights" law and Californians rejected a proposal requiring teens to notify a parent before getting an abortion.

The vote in Texas made it the 19th state to adopt a constitutional marriage amendment, and it passed with ease, winning by a margin of 76-24 percent. Homosexual activists had poured their resources into the state, hoping to pull a stunning upset in a very conservative area of the country. The amendment protects the natural definition of marriage, banning both "gay marriage" and Vermont-style civil unions. A marriage amendment has never lost at the ballot."- Michael Foust, Baptist Press, Nov. 9. 2005

New Hate Crime Report Exposes Homosexual Special Rights Agenda

http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=27898

"Hate crime laws violate freedom of speech, religion, and criminalize thought," said TVC Executive Director Andrea Lafferty today. "Hate crime laws are being used by homosexual activists to punish any person who has the courage to speak out against the recruitment of children by homosexuals."

The report exposes the myth that the United States is experiencing an epidemic of hate crimes--and shows that hate crime laws create a system of unequal justice under the law. "A special interest group that can claim victim status under hate crime laws can punish not only actions, but speech and thought under these laws," said Lafferty. "A person who criticizes homosexual behavior should not have to fear being punished for his views."- PHXnews.com Nov. 7, 2005

An Invasion of the Right to a Personal Opinion

http://www.freecongress.org/commentaries/2005/051104.asp

"..."Was House approval of the Conyers Amendment really a “huge step” toward progress? The Amendment is intended to criminalize “actual or perceived” sexual orientation, gender or gender identity as Federal “hate crime.”...The lobby for homosexual rights claims that the passage of Federal hate-crime legislation relating to sexual orientation is imperative. However, criminals who commit assault and murder usually are not the most logical people. If they are not deterred by existing law why would they be deterred by additional penalties for commission of a Federal “hate crime?” ...in 1992 the Ohio Supreme Court overturned a hate crime law because “ Once the proscribed act is committed, the government criminalizes the underlying thought by enhancing the penalty based on viewpoint. If the legislature can enhance a penalty for crimes committed ‘by reason of racial bigotry,’ why not ‘by reason of opposition to abortion, war, or any other political or moral viewpoint?’” -Stephen M. Lilienthal, Nov. 4, 2005

Battle lines drawn after Kansas gay-sex ruling

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102200896.html?nav=rss_nation/special

"Gay activists applauded a Kansas Supreme Court decision throwing out a measure that allowed vastly harsher punishment for older teenagers who have consensual sex with underage teens of the same gender.

But conservatives cast the ruling as a victory for supporters of a creeping gay-rights agenda.

"This is legislating from the bench that does not reflect the rule of the citizenry," Jerry Johnston, pastor of the First Family Church in Overland Park, Kansas, told Reuters on Saturday."- Ros Krasny, Reuters, Oct. 22, 2005

Battle lines drawn after Kansas gay-sex ruling

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102200896.html?nav=rss_nation/special

"Gay activists applauded a Kansas Supreme Court decision throwing out a measure that allowed vastly harsher punishment for older teenagers who have consensual sex with underage teens of the same gender.

But conservatives cast the ruling as a victory for supporters of a creeping gay-rights agenda.

"This is legislating from the bench that does not reflect the rule of the citizenry," Jerry Johnston, pastor of the First Family Church in Overland Park, Kansas, told Reuters on Saturday."- Ros Krasny, Reuters, Oct. 22, 2005

Senate Panel Passes Sex Offender Bill Without ‘Hate Crimes’ Language

http://www.cwfa.org/articles/9229/CFI/family/index.htm

"

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee today passed on voice vote S. 1086, the Senate version of “The Child Safety Act,” without the “hate crimes” language that passed in the House in September.

This is good news for pro-family Americans. However, CWA has learned that Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) might introduce the “hate crimes” amendment when the bill, which tightens laws regarding sex offenders, comes to the Senate floor. No timeline has been given for a full Senate vote.

Sen. Kennedy also reportedly may try to add the “hate crimes” language to another, unrelated bill, S. 1088, “The Streamlined Procedures Act of 2005,” which deals with the appeals process in criminal cases. "- Robert Knight, CWA, Oct. 20, 2005

Same-sex marrige amendment provokes complaints by gay and lesbian rights groups

http://www.timesguardian.com/0720-4.html

"Gay and lesbian rights groups have sponsored a series of television ads that will oppose a proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriages.

The ads began airing in Houston last week, according to the Associated Press.

Proposition 2 would amend the Texas Constitution to ban same-sex marriage, although same-sex marriage is already banned by state law in Texas and in more than a dozen other states."- TimesGuardian.com, Oct. 2005

The issue in question here is the current Texas law that prohibits same sex marriage. It was just such a law that the Massachussetts Supreme Court judges deemed prejudicial and arbitrarily replaced with laws allowing gay marriage, circumventing the voice or vote of the citizens of that state. Proposition 2 was created to back up the vulnerable state law and insure that only the people of Texas, themselves, can decide to have gay marriage or not. It is written in such language as will prevent the judicial usurpation of voters rights that occurred in Massachussetts from happening in Texas. - Nancy Brown

In Texas, Marriage Is on Ballot

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/13/national/13ballot.html

"The commercial, one of seven unveiled here Wednesday by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, is part of the opening advertising campaign in a battle over a ballot proposition to ban same-sex marriage in the Texas Constitution.

The volatile issue comes before Texas voters on Nov. 8, a year after 13 states changed their constitutions to ban same-sex marriage and half a year after Kansas. The television spots will appear several times a day for a week on three network affiliates in the Houston area. The final message of the spots: Vote no.

In an equally charged drive to pass the proposed amendment, the Texas Restoration Project, a network of conservative Christian pastors and others, has been mobilizing supporters to turn out for the vote. "- Ralph Bleumenthal, New York Times, Oct. 13, 2005

House Adds Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation to 'Hate Crimes' Measure

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200509/CUL20050915a.html

"The U.S. House of Representatives passed a "hate crimes" measure on Wednesday...that would expand federal protection to people victimized because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and disability...Homosexual advocacy groups have long pressed for the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity.."Criminalizing thoughts as well as actions, and creating special categories of victims, are contrary to our entire system of laws," said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins in a statement released after the House vote."- Susan Jones, CNSNEWS.com, Senior Editor, Sept. 15, 2005

Massachusetts Attorney General Approves Ballot for Gay “Marriage” Constitutional Amendment Vote

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/sep/05090803.html

"The Massachusetts attorney general approved a ballot Wednesday that would allow voters an opportunity to overturn a 2003 activist court decision by voting on a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex “marriage” for the commonwealth during the next general election in 2008.

The approval from Attorney General Thomas Reilly now means that the Massachusetts Family Institute can begin to gather the 65,825 signatures necessary for the next approval stage of the ballot. Assuming the petition, due December 7, succeeds, the next hurdle is garnering 25 percent support among lawmakers in both 2006 and 2007, before the measure is finally approved for the ballot in 2008. "- LifeSiteNews.com Sept. 8, 2005

Revived measure removes gender from legal definition

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/08/26/BAG46ED6N11.DTL&feed=rss.news

"A revived bill to allow same-sex marriage is headed for the Senate floor early next week after clearing the Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday...AB849 would make marriage as defined by law gender neutral by taking out the notion that marriage is between a man and a woman."- Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau, Aug. 26, 2005

Wash. state awaits 'gay marriage' decision; it could become 2nd state to redefine marriage

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=21450

"OLYMPIA, Wash. (BP)--Homosexual activists, on the defensive since the November election, could receive a boost in coming days when the Washington state Supreme Court hands down a much-anticipated "gay marriage" decision.

The high court heard a case in early March asking it to strike down Washington's marriage laws and legalize "gay marriage.” It is expected to issue its ruling any week now." - Michael Foust, Baptist Press, Aug. 24, 2005

Liberals to Fast-Track Gay Marriage Bill - Aim for Passage Prior to Summer Recess

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jun/05060205.html

In a last minute effort to guarantee passage, the Liberal Party has decided to fast track the gay marriage bill in exchange for the Democratic Party's support on other issues. This situation will prevent pro-family witnesses slated to testify before the committee from having any impact on the vote. "It became obvious today that there is an agenda to fast-track this. My clear indication from caucus was they want this bill done, they want it done before the end of June. They want it out of the House and over to the Senate, which is prepared to do the damn thing. I don't support that, there's a whole lot of us that don't support fast-tracking it." said Liberal MP Pat O'Brien

Gays Float New Hate-Crimes Bill

http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0036696.cfm

Openly gay legislators Sen Barney Frank-D Mass. and Rep. Tammy Baldwin D-Wis have proposed a bill giving protections and rights to transgendered persons above what is already constitutionally guaranteed to all American Citizens. The heart of this proposal involves real or "PERCEIVED" acts that are attempted or end in violence.

Kentucky Judge Upholds Same-Sex Amendment

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/26/AR2005052601960.html

"A judge on Thursday upheld the state's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages, saying it was properly presented to voters last fall." - The Associated Press
Thursday, May 26, 2005; 11:31 PM

Drive is on to ban gay marriage

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/azstar/20050517/lo_azstar/driveisontobangaymarriagereligiousleaderssplitreadytodobattleonballotproposal

Religious leaders split, ready to do battle on ballot proposal

By Stephanie Innes and Howard Fischer , Arizona Daily Star Capitol Media Services -Tue May 17, 4:41 AM ET

Conservative Christians go to bat for legislation to outlaw legal status for the union of any unmarried couple that equals that of a married couple. The opposition, ironically, used the same argument that is being used across the country by radical judges and others who promote gay marriage  by proclaiming that such legislation is merely an act of prejudice and is therefore discriminatory and illegal.

Call for Veto on Colorado Gay Rights Bills

http://www.family.org/cforum/statenews/a0036564.cfm

May 16, 2005

by Mona Passignano, state issues analyst

The Governor of Colorado is considering two bills passed supposedly to protect the civil rights of gays and defend them from criminal injustice.. However, according to Melissa Fryrear, gender issues analyst at Focus on the Family, "Senate Bill 28 would create a new class of specially-protected people based on behavioral choices."

Unlike race and gender, she said homosexuality is not genetic, so "defeating these bills won't deny gays any of their rights—it just won't grant them special rights."

Joel McNally: Hate crime laws at odds with free thought, speech

http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/index.php?ntid=38952&ntpid=1

Anyone who objects to government trying to criminalize thoughts and speech always has a tough time explaining why it's a bad idea to prosecute so-called hate crimes.

That's because the acts that have been defined as hate crimes are so, well, hateful.

State OKs Constitutional Ban On Gay Marriage

http://www.nbc5i.com/politics/4418617/detail.html?rss=dfw&psp=news

POSTED: 3:48 pm CDT April 26, 2005
UPDATED: 3:59 pm CDT April 26, 2005

State Representatives approved a constitutional amendment to ban gay couples from marrying.

The measure was intended to prevent possible challenges to existing state law that makes same-sex marriages illegal.

House Vote Would Add Gay Marriage Ban To Texas Consitution

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/keye/20050426/lo_keye/housevotewouldaddgaymarriagebantotexasconsitution

Mon Apr 25,10:01 PM ET

Texas House lawmakers have approved a constitutional amendment to ban gay couples from marrying. The measure is intended to stem possible challenges to the existing state law that makes same sex marriages illegal. It passed with a vote of 101-29, one vote more than what was required for approval of a constitutional amendment in the House.

Navajos outlaw same-sex marriage

http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/12974.html

 

The Associated Press
April 23, 2005

WINDOW ROCK, Ariz. -- The Navajo Nation has outlawed same-sex marriages on its sprawling Indian reservation.

The Tribal Council voted unanimously Friday in favor of the Diné Marriage Act of 2005. Diné is the Navajos' name for themselves.

The act restricts a recognized union to a relationship between a man and a woman and prohibits plural marriages as well as any marriage between parents and children, grandparents and grandchildren, brothers and sisters and other close relatives.

Ex-Gay Legislation Introduced in Hate Crimes Bill

http://www.earnedmedia.org/pfox0412.htm

To: National Desk, Political Reporter

Contact: Regina Griggs, Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays, PFOX Executive Director, 703-360-2225, ex-gays@earthlink.net

ANNAPOLIS, Md., April 12 /Christian Wire Service/ -- Many thanks to Maryland state senator Alex Mooney for introducing an amendment to include "former homosexuals" to the Maryland sexual orientation hate crimes bill. You can listen to Sen. Mooney's speech to the senate at http://mlis.state.md.us/asp/listen.asp  Under "Listen to Prior Senate Proceedings," select Wednesday, April 6, Session #2 and when the audio comes on, fast forward to 1 hour and 22 minutes (1:22) to hear the ex-gay speech. PFOX believes this is the first time ex-gay legislation has been introduced anywhere in the country.

Although the ex-gay amendment was rejected by a vote of 15 - 28, it alerted the Maryland state senate to the intolerance ex-gays face in Maryland. For example, our PFOX ex-gay representative on the Family Life Committee of the Montgomery County Maryland Board of Education had her ex-gay materials rejected by the Committee. Instead, the Committee and the Montgomery County, Maryland Board of Education approved materials published by gay activist organizations as school resources, even though some of these gay materials contain hateful claims about ex-gays. This was not considered "hate speech" because the hate was directed against ex-gays and not against gays.

Last year PFOX's ex-gay billboard in Rockville Maryland was interpreted as "hate" against gays by lesbian protestors and Equality Maryland, a gay rights organization.

Magellan Health Service, based in Columbia Maryland, is the largest managed behavioral health care company in the nation. Last month, Magellan dismissed psychology professor Dr. Warren Throckmorton from its National Provider Advisory Council because of complaints from gay activists that he counsels individuals struggling with unwanted same sex attractions.

The Prince George's Sentinel, a Maryland newspaper, refuses to accept PFOX news releases because it considers ex-gay press releases to be "hate mail."

Linda Wall, a former lesbian, was equated to the "Taliban crashing into the Twin Towers" by a gay activist because she shared her coming out of the lifestyle story with a student who had testified before the Maryland State Board of Education that he was "gay."

Maryland ex-gay author Richard Cohen was accused of hate against homosexuals when he released his new book 'Coming Out Straight'.

The list is endless because every day brings new hostile acts against the ex-gay community under the justification of fighting "hate" against homosexuals. In this climate of intolerance against ex-gays due to their very existence, support for the ex-gay community is interpreted as bigotry against homosexuals.

Claims of hate based on sexual orientation should not be used to silence the ex-gay community and their supporters. Nor should sexual orientation hate crime laws be misused to legitimize intolerance against ex-gays. To give sexual orientation protection to one group while excluding another is discriminatory.

A copy of this media advisory is available online at: http://www.pfox.org/asp/newsman/templates/newstemplate.asp?articleid=212&zoneid=2

House proposal would ban state from recognizing same-sex unions

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3118055

Gay marriage targeted in bill

By JEFFREY GILBERT
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau

AUSTIN - When Dick and Jimmie Sue Francis' son told them he was gay several years ago, they talked to his friends, read up on the subject and looked to their faith.

Congress Considers Pro-Family Agenda

http://family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0036080.cfm

April 4, 2005

by Steve Jordahl, correspondent

The House and Senate are back in session, with a key battle for President Bush's judicial nominees expected soon.

Congress reconvenes today after its spring recess, with observers expecting one of the key battles on the horizon to be a showdown over the president's judicial nominees.

Governor of Maine Signs Gay Rights Bill

http://www.statesman.com/news/content/shared-gen/ap/National/Gay_Rights.html

By GLENN ADAMS
Associated Press Writer
March 31, 2005 - 8:47 p.m.

AUGUSTA, Maine — Gov. John Baldacci on Thursday signed legislation that protects gays and lesbians from discrimination. Within hours, a religious group launched a campaign to overturn the new law.

Kansans Will Settle Marriage Debate at Polls

http://family.org/cforum/statenews/a0035994.cfm

March 28, 2005

by Erin Blad, constituent communications senior coordinator

Kansans have the opportunity to become the 18th state to define marriage in their constitution.

The long struggle to protect marriage in Kansas now comes down to a simple vote of the people. On April 5, voters across the state will go to their polling places to vote on municipal issues — and they will also have the opportunity to vote for a marriage-protection amendment that would define marriage as between one man and one woman in the state constitution.

Bush: Court rulings vindicate support for marriage amendment

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=20366

Mar 16, 2005
By Michael Foust

WASHINGTON (BP)--President Bush said March 16 that judicial rulings supporting same-sex "marriage" -- such as the recent one in California -- are justifying his support for a marriage amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Texas: Homosexuals keeping an eye on proposals in the Legislature

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA031605.11A.lege_outside.140abb4c3.html

Web Posted: 03/16/2005 12:00 AM CST
Lomi Kriel
Express-News Austin Bureau

AUSTIN — It's a small room on the east side of the Student Services building at the University of Texas here.

Gay marriage ban passes Iowa house

http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1047326&l=1&t=Iowa+%2F+Illinois&c=24,1047326

By Associated Press
March 15, 2005

DES MOINES (AP) — A proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage passed the House 54-44 today, but is not likely to make its way into the Iowa Constitution.

Indiana: Gay-marriage ban to get House vote

http://www.indystar.com/articles/7/229276-9337-009.html

By Tim Evans
March 15, 2005

After more than a year of waiting, the Indiana House of Representatives will finally vote on a proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Alabama Legislature approves ban on same-sex marriages

http://www.al.com/newsflash/regional/index.ssf?/base/news-12/1110493599136460.xml&storylist=alabamanews

3/10/2005, 4:27 p.m. CT
By PHILLIP RAWLS
The Associated Press

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A year after a wave of gay marriages swept America, the Alabama Legislature approved a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriages in the state and refuse to recognize those from other states.

Bill submitted to allow gays in military

http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050302-065604-3210r.htm

By Pamela Hess
Pentagon correspondent

Washington, DC, Mar. 2 (UPI) -- Fifty-two Democrats and a single Republican Wednesday sponsored a bill that would allow homosexuals to serve openly in the military, and give those who left under the policy banning gays a chance to rejoin the armed forces.

Lawmaker Introduces Bill to Prohibit Abortions of Gay Unborn Children

http://www.lifenews.com/printpage.php

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
February 25, 2005


Augusta, ME (LifeNews.com) -- A lawmaker in Maine has introduced legislation to prohibit abortions on unborn children who are gay. The legislation has raised eyebrows of both those involved in the abortion debate and those who debate whether or not genetics has any bearing on someone's sexuality.

State Rep. Brian Duprey introduced the measure that would protect gay babies.

He told the Portland Press Herald newspaper that listening to the Rush Limbaugh show gave him the idea for the bill. Limbaugh had commented that if scientists ever discovered a gene that caused a person to be gay, then homosexual activists would become pro-life "overnight."

Indiana: Senate OKs ban on gay marriages

http://www.indystar.com/articles/6/224143-7046-009.html

By Mary Beth Schneider
February 22, 2005

The Indiana Senate voted overwhelmingly Monday to make a ban on same-sex marriages a part of the state constitution, shipping the controversial issue to the House.

Libs could lose next election over same-sex: Liberal MP Pat O'Brien

http://www.thehilltimes.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2005/february/7/election_risk/&c=1

The Hill Times, February 7th, 2005
NEWS STORY
By F. Abbas Rana

A maverick government backbencher and staunch opponent of same-sex marriage is warning that the governing Liberals' support of the controversial same-sex marriage issue could mean the party will lose the next election and is urging the Prime Minister not to go ahead with this legislation and consider using the notwithstanding clause.

Indiana court rules against same-sex 'marriage'

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050120-115320-8563r.htm



By Cheryl Wetzstein
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

An Indiana appellate court yesterday ruled unanimously that homosexual couples do not have the right to "marry" in that state.
    "What we decide today is that the Indiana Constitution does not require the governmental recognition of same-sex marriage, although the Legislature is certainly free to grant such recognition or create a parallel institution under that document," Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Michael Barnes wrote.

Federal judge in Tampa upholds U.S. Defense of Marriage Act

http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/10683156.htm




Associated Press

A federal judge Wednesday upheld the federal law letting states ban same-sex marriages, dismissing a lawsuit brought by two women seeking to have their Massachusetts marriage recognized elsewhere.

Attorneys for conservative groups hailed the ruling by U.S. District Judge James S. Moody as an important first step in upholding the federal law, but said they anticipated lengthy appeals.

Supreme Court Reinstates Same-Sex Marriage Amendment

http://www.theneworleanschannel.com/news/4107922/detail.html

POSTED: 11:33 am CST January 19, 2005
UPDATED: 2:38 pm CST January 19, 2005

The Louisiana Supreme Court today reinstated the anti-gay marriage amendment to the state constitution that was approved by nearly four out of every five voters in September.

Gay marriage amendment used in domestic violence cases

http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_fullstory.asp?id=28846

 

POSTED: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:05:25 PM
UPDATED: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:09:47 PM

CLEVELAND -- Ohio’s new gay marriage amendment is being used by some attorneys to defend unmarried clients against domestic violence charges.

Majority of lawmakers support banning gay marriage

http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/10599213.htm

Posted on Sat, Jan. 08, 2005




Associated Press

If a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage is introduced in the South Dakota Legislature, it would find strong support from state lawmakers, according to a survey by The Associated Press.

Senator blasts decision to limit gay marriage defendants

http://www.accessnorthga.com/news/ap_newfullstory.asp?ID=52464

The Associated Press - ATLANTA

A judge's decision to limit defendants in a gay marriage lawsuit was blasted Thursday by the marriage ban's original sponsor.

Sen. Mike Crotts, a Republican from Conyers who sponsored Georgia's constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and civil unions, said he and any other interested lawmakers should be free to join the governor in defending the amendment, which was overwhelmingly approved by voters last November.

The politics of the gay-rights debate

http://www.augustafreepress.com/stories/storyReader$30256

Chris Graham

So ... what is with all the hubbub about gay rights these days?

Family-rights advocates would say that it is the handiwork of gay and lesbian activists trying to legitimize a way of life that they say is far from the mainstream of American society.

Those activists, significantly, would point the finger squarely back at the self-styled defenders of the family.

Gay marriage amendment not coming soon

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apwashington_story.asp?category=1153&slug=Gay%20Marriage%20Congress

By DAVID ESPO
AP SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

A Catholic supporter of the Federal Marriage Amendment is blocked by a gay American flag from a protestor before a march from the Sts. Paul and Peter Church through North Beach in San Francisco in this Saturday, April 3, 2004 file photo. The parade was to affirm marriage between heterosexuals.

While the Nov. 2 election also increased the ranks of amendment supporters in both houses of Congress, the gains were relatively small.

Pro-Family Californian Denounces Illegal Homosexual 'Marriage' Bill

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/12/82004a.asp

By Jenni Parker
December 8, 2004

(AgapePress) - On the first day of the California State Legislature's new session, Democrats in the assembly reintroduced their top priority -- a bill to legalize same-sex "marriage" statewide. Pro-family leaders in the state are condemning the pro-homosexual bill as both anti-democratic and a slap in the face of the voters who almost five years ago passed Proposition 22, a ballot measure protecting traditional marriage.

Pro-traditional Marriage Bill, Pro-homosexual Marriage Bill Introduced in California

http://www.christianpost.com/article/society/1229/section/pro-traditional.marriage.bill.pro-homosexual.marriage.bill.introduced.in.california/1.htm

Tuesday, Dec. 7, 2004 Posted: 3:30:35PM EST

Two bills presented on the first day of the new legislative session in the California State Legislature are in competition for the future definition of marriage in the state—one would legalize homosexual marriage and the other would elevate the statue defining marriage between a man and a woman to an amendment in the State Constitution.

Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco filed on Monday the "Marriage License Nondiscrimination Act,” renamed “Religious Freedom and California Civil Marriage Protection Act," which amends the definition of marriage found in the California Family Code to mean "a personal relationship arising out of a civil contract between two persons."

The legislation needs 41 votes before it heads from the Assembly over to the California Senate.

Plan would offer protection on basis of gender identity

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002109927_transside05m.html

Sunday, December 05, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

By Keith Ervin
Seattle Times staff reporter

The Omnibus Civil Rights Ordinance under consideration by the Metropolitan King County Council would amend existing ordinances that prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, contracting and public accommodations.

The ordinance, proposed by County Executive Ron Sims, combines "housekeeping" measures with more substantial changes suggested five years ago by the Coalition for Enforceable Discrimination Laws.

Drafting the changes took so long because of the complexity of reconciling inconsistencies in existing county ordinances and bringing them into conformity with current federal statutes, said Bailey deIongh, manager of the county's Office of Civil Rights.

The more substantive provisions would

KY gay marriage amendment challenged in court

http://www.fox41.com/news/news_detail.asp?id=19509&section=2

Three people have filed an election challenge, asking that a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in Kentucky be overturned.

Voters overwhelmingly approved the ballot measure during the election two weeks ago.

But the court challenge says the amendment is flawed because it dealt with two separate issues

1 Year Since Goodridge Ruling

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/11-17-2004/0002461964&EDATE==

    WASHINGTON, Nov. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- On November 18, 2003 The Massachusetts
Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health,
imposed a mandate to create and legalize same-sex "marriage" within the state
based on their belief that there is no "rational" reason to deny homosexuals
the right to marry.  In doing so, the SJC redefined marriage by judicial fiat
and infringed on the constitutional power of the legislature to make laws and
effectuate social change.
    Tony Perkins, President of Family Research Council says that, "Marriage is
about more than tax credits and other financial benefits.  It is about
preserving the best environment for raising children and the safest,
healthiest living situation for adults.  Without strong marriages as our
bedrock, our nation will suffer a devastating blow."
    Since the Massachusetts ruling, 13 states have overwhelmingly voted to ban
same-sex "marriage."

SOURCE Family Research Council
Web Site: http://www.frc.org

Jones Pushes Gay Rights Bill in the State Senate

http://www.illinoisleader.com/news/newsview.asp?c=20811

Vote Could Happen Today

Tuesday, November 09, 2004

By The Leader-Chicago Bureau

SPRINGFIELD -- If homosexual rights activists are successful today in pushing through a bill that would add the term “sexual orientation” to the state’s Human Rights Act, Illinois would become the fifteenth state to protect persons from discrimination based on their sexual behavior.

Pro-family leaders say the legislation may be called for a vote as soon as Tuesday or as late as next January. Homosexual activist leaders say nothing will happen during the fall veto session.

“We won't be moving SB101 during veto [session], Rick Garcia, director of Equality Illinois said via e-mail today.

Jumping on the Gay Marriage "BannedWagon"

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041109-120703-4973r.htm

States lining up to outlaw same-sex 'marriage'


By Cheryl Wetzstein
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The next round of proposals to amend state constitutions to define marriage will begin in a few weeks as lawmakers in as many as nine states promise to get such measures before voters.
    In Texas yesterday, state Rep. Warren Chisum "pre-filed" a constitutional amendment to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
    Virginia lawmakers have pre-filed a similar amendment, while state legislators in Washington, Idaho, South Carolina and Alabama have said they will introduce marriage amendments as soon as possible.

Lawmaker files to define marriage as between a man and a woman

http://www.kvue.com/news/local/stories/110804kvueAmendment-eh.3888d36b.html

12:26 PM CST on Monday, November 8, 2004

By George Kanuck / KVUE News

Gay and lesbian activists are speaking out against a proposed amendment to the Texas Constitution.

The amendment would define marriage as between one man and one woman.

Last week eleven states across the country adopted amendments to their states' constitutions, defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Now Republican State Representative Warren Chisum is pre-filing an amendment to Texas' constitution to do the same.

Pre-filing for the 79th Legislative session began Monday. The session begins January 11.

The Lesbian and Gay Rights Lobby of Texas held a press conference to speak against the proposed amendment, arguing that the amendment is an attack on Texas families.

IFI Asks Speaker Madigan to Stop Blocking Marriage Protection in Illinois After Marriage Amendment Sweep in 11 States Including Liberal Oregon

http://http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/11-04-2004/0002356407&EDATE=  

    GLEN ELLYN, Ill., Nov. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Peter LaBarbera, Executive
Director of the Illinois Family Institute, said the passage of marriage-
defense amendments in 11 states on Election Day presages a victory for a
similar amendment in Illinois if politicians like House Speaker Mike Madigan
would allow it to be put before the voters.
    LaBarbera called on Speaker Madigan to stop blocking pro-family efforts to
permanently defend marriage in this state and to give the Illinois Marriage
Protection Amendment favored consideration in 2005.
    "Any doubts about how strongly Americans feel about protecting marriage
from being radically redefined should be gone after the clean sweep of
November 2nd," LaBarbera said.  "If a constitutional amendment preserving
marriage as one-man, one-woman can pass in liberal Oregon, then we know it
will pass in Illinois."